Welcome to GuzziTech.com   Guest     

Banner
 

Enter Amount:

GuzziTech.com Forum • Memjet Module

Memjet Module

Have a Stelvio? Lucky you. Please drop in with chat/questions/comments on the all-new Adventure Guzzi.

Moderators: john zibell, Mike.C, Wayne Orwig

Memjet Module

Postby guzziben47 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:56 am

I notice there is a company called Memjet that is making an adjustible performance module for the Stelvio. I'm sure it's not as good as the Power Commander, but it looks like a possible less expensive alternative. Has anyone ever tried one?
Ben
Boston, Massachusetts
User avatar
guzziben47
GT Contributor!
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:57 am

Re: Memjet Module

Postby kmartin » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:56 am

If this is the device that fools the temperature sensor, then the Piaggio service rep had one on the Griso demo at John Day. The bike ran great with that and a Termignoni exhaust. He tried to tell me that it's a cheaper, simpler, way to adjust fueling. It did work well on the demo bike, but I haven't ridden a stock one to compare.
Keith
User avatar
kmartin
Cruisin' Guzzista
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:58 pm
Location: SoCal Mountains

Re: Memjet Module

Postby GT-Rx » Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:30 am

Ben, there's a couple "band-aid" options out there that you can waste $100 on. It will run different, just not much better. You get what you pay for (sorry). :whistle:

Keith, that's quite surprising that the Piaggio Tech guys knowingly admitted running something like that on demos... though I have to commend them for acknowledging that they still run poorly, even with the map "updates."
Todd at
GuzziTech.com
SoCal GuzziTech Power Since 2001!

Image Image
User avatar
GT-Rx
Administrator
 
Posts: 3720
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:29 pm
Location: SoCal U.S.A.

Re: Memjet Module

Postby kmartin » Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:54 am

He was quick to pull the seat and show it to me. I think it was after he knew Ray and I had your setup on our Stelvios. But you know what happend with Ray. I hope he's got things back together, the map update pretty much ruined his weekend.
Keith
User avatar
kmartin
Cruisin' Guzzista
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:58 pm
Location: SoCal Mountains

Re: Memjet Module

Postby pete roper » Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:05 am

I'm assuming that the demo bikes were 2010 models and if that is the case there should of been no need for any sort of ECU fooler to get them to run satisfactorily. All the 2010 models, to the best of my knowledge, are using the A8 motor which seems to run pretty nicely as delivered. Not suggesting that it can't be improved upon, simply that if they are set up right they run nicely. Bit of a sad indictment if the importer can't get the wee bugger to run right....

Pete
pete roper
GT Contributor!
 
Posts: 2310
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:54 pm

Re: Memjet Module

Postby guzzi jon » Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:45 am

I will be installing todd's full setup on my G11 shortly, then sacrifice my fatduc in some form of voodoo ceremony
guzzi jon
GT Contributor!
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:20 pm

Re: Memjet Module

Postby Mi_ka » Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:38 pm

These "low tech" solutions are not good enough and eventually you are paying more in fuel as, in order to have no lean areas, you are getting too rich in other places of the map. And who knows what happens on a much colder day...

Even if you do not want to go the experienced "plug and play" way Todd offers and prefer to do your own map on some PC type accessory, go for the proper expensive devices.
Chances are you will finally be paying more than Todd's solutions except if you have a (very) friendly dynamometer that will not charge the man hours needed to produce a proper map and recheck it in different climate conditions...
Michail,
a Guzzista at heart
Mi_ka
Cruisin' Guzzista
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:05 pm
Location: Athens, Greece

Re: Memjet Module

Postby guzziben47 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 5:30 am

I'm sure the Power Commander is better. I'm just thinking I may not need everything it has to offer. I'm happy with the power the bike has, and I can live with the dip in the curve. All I really want is the bike to run smoother. Also, I'd like something that is easy to install, and is removable if it doesn't work out. I'll probably save up for the PCV; I just like to know what else is out there....
Ben
Boston, Massachusetts
User avatar
guzziben47
GT Contributor!
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:57 am

Re: Memjet Module

Postby Mi_ka » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:49 am

For what it is worth, I am tech supporting a competing firm to DJ in the dyno section and I am a DJ products skeptic (ok, mostly due to personal bias :roll: ) .
So when I tell you to go Todd's way, it is not because I have anything pro to this solution except plain simple honesty.

If you go the cheap way, you can make the bike run better (not too lean after less restrictive breathing in-out) but you are not altering the map - just putting an offset to the "point normal". So the map will still be a mess, just not too lean.
If you can live with that then no problem but you can never know what really happens in your engine.
If you do heavy mileage, then chances are that you will be paying the difference in gas and still have no proper mapping...
Michail,
a Guzzista at heart
Mi_ka
Cruisin' Guzzista
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:05 pm
Location: Athens, Greece

Re: Memjet Module

Postby guzziben47 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:47 am

If what you say is true, then that's pretty disconcerting for anyone who owns a Guzzi. If the manufacturer is so incompetent they are shipping these bikes with feul mapping that is a "mess," then that doesn't imply anything positive about the rest of the bike. I'm sure the guy programming the PC-V is a smart, capable guy, but if he is that much better than the engineers at the second oldest motorcycle manufacturer in the world, that suggests Moto Guzzi has some serious problems. And it's only rational to infer those problems extend beyond the fuel mapping.

Mayble I'm deluding myself, but at least for the time being, I prefer to think the problem is just the restrictive EPA requirements in the US. MG is forced to import this bike running way too lean, and with way too many other environmental add-ons. If you richen up the mixture and remove some of the add-ons, you'll have a great bike.

Call it blind faith but I'm hoping that's true!!!
Ben
Boston, Massachusetts
User avatar
guzziben47
GT Contributor!
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:57 am

Next

Return to Stelvio Chat & Tech

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests